Comments for Synaptic http://blog.peltarion.com The Peltarion Blog Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:02:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 Comment on The Talented Dr. Hebb, Part 1, Novelty Filtering by Michelle http://blog.peltarion.com/2006/05/11/the-talented-dr-hebb-part-1-novelty-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-28211 Michelle Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:47:45 +0000 http://blog.peltarion.com/2006/05/11/the-talented-dr-hebb-part-1-novelty-filtering/#comment-28211 Thank you, this is very informative! Thank you, this is very informative!

]]> Comment on Fuzzy Math, Part 2, In Synapse by Jelena http://blog.peltarion.com/2007/01/01/fuzzy-math-part-2-in-synapse/comment-page-1/#comment-26909 Jelena Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:53:38 +0000 http://blog.peltarion.com/2007/01/01/fuzzy-math-part-2-in-synapse/#comment-26909 Is it possible to present some data to Peltarion and let it find fuzzy rules for this data itself? Is it possible to present some data to Peltarion and let it find fuzzy rules for this data itself?

]]> Comment on Peltarion Forums Online! by Roger earth 4 energy review http://blog.peltarion.com/2008/09/10/peltarion-forums-online/comment-page-1/#comment-26471 Roger earth 4 energy review Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:14:43 +0000 http://blog.peltarion.com/?p=79#comment-26471 I see that the forum has been working perfectly in the last month, but there isn’t that much activity. I usually checking once every couple of days for a new post and I try to get involved in the parts which interest me. The good thing is that everything is stable, I am sure that it will get more populated in the future. I see that the forum has been working perfectly in the last month, but there isn’t that much activity. I usually checking once every couple of days for a new post and I try to get involved in the parts which interest me. The good thing is that everything is stable, I am sure that it will get more populated in the future.

]]> Comment on The Talented Dr. Hebb, Part 1, Novelty Filtering by Luka (Peltarion) http://blog.peltarion.com/2006/05/11/the-talented-dr-hebb-part-1-novelty-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-25172 Luka (Peltarion) Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:05:27 +0000 http://blog.peltarion.com/2006/05/11/the-talented-dr-hebb-part-1-novelty-filtering/#comment-25172 Yes, Synapse: http://www.peltarion.com/products/synapse Yes, Synapse: http://www.peltarion.com/products/synapse

]]> Comment on The Talented Dr. Hebb, Part 1, Novelty Filtering by rey hass http://blog.peltarion.com/2006/05/11/the-talented-dr-hebb-part-1-novelty-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-25034 rey hass Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:37:10 +0000 http://blog.peltarion.com/2006/05/11/the-talented-dr-hebb-part-1-novelty-filtering/#comment-25034 is there a stimulator that can facilate this? Thanks, Rey is there a stimulator that can facilate this? Thanks, Rey

]]> Comment on The Self-Organized Gene (Part 2) by Luka (Peltarion) http://blog.peltarion.com/2007/06/13/the-self-organized-gene-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24553 Luka (Peltarion) Mon, 03 Nov 2008 10:31:21 +0000 http://blog.peltarion.com/2007/06/13/the-self-organized-gene-part-2/#comment-24553 The reason why the U-matrix doesn't look like the clusters is because it hasn't been used. U-matrices can be difficult to interpret and there are better ways of finding clusters. The actual algorithm used is a neural gas that finds the clusters in the SOM. The reason why the U-matrix doesn’t look like the clusters is because it hasn’t been used. U-matrices can be difficult to interpret and there are better ways of finding clusters. The actual algorithm used is a neural gas that finds the clusters in the SOM.

]]> Comment on Fuzzy Math, Part 1, The Theory by JackK http://blog.peltarion.com/2006/10/25/fuzzy-math-part-1-the-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-24501 JackK Sat, 01 Nov 2008 11:31:18 +0000 http://blog.peltarion.com/2006/10/25/fuzzy-math-part-1-the-theory/#comment-24501 When the part 2 will be available? When the part 2 will be available?

]]> Comment on The Self-Organized Gene (Part 2) by JackK http://blog.peltarion.com/2007/06/13/the-self-organized-gene-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24457 JackK Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:34:29 +0000 http://blog.peltarion.com/2007/06/13/the-self-organized-gene-part-2/#comment-24457 Ok. Next question (the last, I think). The image titled "Clusters" does not look like (for me) to be created according to that "10-dimension" U-matrix. The U-matrix for "Column0" clearly shows that there are 3 clusters. However from "10-dimension" U-matrix it's hard (for me) to see the areas of 3 clusters you showed. Can you help me again? Ok.
Next question (the last, I think). The image titled “Clusters” does not look like (for me) to be created according to that “10-dimension” U-matrix. The U-matrix for “Column0″ clearly shows that there are 3 clusters. However from “10-dimension” U-matrix it’s hard (for me) to see the areas of 3 clusters you showed. Can you help me again?

]]> Comment on The Self-Organized Gene (Part 2) by Luka http://blog.peltarion.com/2007/06/13/the-self-organized-gene-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24455 Luka Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:01:52 +0000 http://blog.peltarion.com/2007/06/13/the-self-organized-gene-part-2/#comment-24455 The U-matrix is calculated as the distance between the nodes. It doesn't matter in how many dimensions the map itself is - it's still standard euclidian distance that is used. So for each node the distance to its neighbours is calculated. The U-matrix is calculated as the distance between the nodes. It doesn’t matter in how many dimensions the map itself is - it’s still standard euclidian distance that is used. So for each node the distance to its neighbours is calculated.

]]> Comment on The Self-Organized Gene (Part 2) by JackK http://blog.peltarion.com/2007/06/13/the-self-organized-gene-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-24453 JackK Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:13:40 +0000 http://blog.peltarion.com/2007/06/13/the-self-organized-gene-part-2/#comment-24453 Hi, I understand maplets very well. I also understand U-matrix from your example (created from image of feature named "Column0"). I can't, however, understand the U-matrix which is on the image below the sentence "Now you should understand how to read and interpret a SOM displayed like this one in Synapse:". There is only 1 U-matrix but we have 10 features (from Population" to "Cows"). That is that U-matrix's construction? Please explain me this in simple words (my english is not very good). Thanks in advance. Hi,

I understand maplets very well. I also understand U-matrix from your example (created from image of feature named “Column0″). I can’t, however, understand the U-matrix which is on the image below the sentence “Now you should understand how to read and interpret a SOM displayed like this one in Synapse:”. There is only 1 U-matrix but we have 10 features (from Population” to “Cows”). That is that U-matrix’s construction?
Please explain me this in simple words (my english is not very good).
Thanks in advance.

]]>